esoteric
02-10-2006, 11:21 AM
I had an interesting thought the other day during one of my classes that I thought I would bring up for conversation. It seems to me a lot of hypnosis work is strongly related to classical/operant conditioning. For anyone not familiar with conditioning it was discovered, for lack of a better term, by the famous biologist Pavlov and his dogs. He trained dogs to salivate at the sound of a bell instead of a food, because they were conditioned to expect food after the tone of a bell. But of course this was the original work done in the field and it has become much more elaborate.
Back to my point, hypnosis/trance work seems to work on this principle. By having people visual situations with different outcomes and using suggests for new attitudes and associations, a lot of times people are learning to associate a stimulus with a different, ie. desired response. Smoking, allergies, pain management, etc. pop into mind as prime example. Perhaps due to the bypass of the critical factor hypnosis is a more effective and faster route in conditioning work.
I started thinking about this because we were talking about conditioning that has happened with cancer patients and chemotherapy. Chemo has the effect of taking down a persons immune systems, and a study conducted found that after repeated chemotherapy exposures (original stimulus) a person's immune system (response) goes down when they enter the hospital (new stimulus), even before they therapy is started. So, when hypnosis intervenes in similar situations it seems to be a similar state of conditioning. For example, with allergy treatment, hypnosis patients are trained generally, not to have the association of an allergic (new response) reaction with hay, cat, etc. (stimulus). I'm not sure how well I explained my reasoning, but I think I got my point across.
So, what do you guys think? Is a lot of hypnosis work conditioning done with people simply in a hypnotic state?
Back to my point, hypnosis/trance work seems to work on this principle. By having people visual situations with different outcomes and using suggests for new attitudes and associations, a lot of times people are learning to associate a stimulus with a different, ie. desired response. Smoking, allergies, pain management, etc. pop into mind as prime example. Perhaps due to the bypass of the critical factor hypnosis is a more effective and faster route in conditioning work.
I started thinking about this because we were talking about conditioning that has happened with cancer patients and chemotherapy. Chemo has the effect of taking down a persons immune systems, and a study conducted found that after repeated chemotherapy exposures (original stimulus) a person's immune system (response) goes down when they enter the hospital (new stimulus), even before they therapy is started. So, when hypnosis intervenes in similar situations it seems to be a similar state of conditioning. For example, with allergy treatment, hypnosis patients are trained generally, not to have the association of an allergic (new response) reaction with hay, cat, etc. (stimulus). I'm not sure how well I explained my reasoning, but I think I got my point across.
So, what do you guys think? Is a lot of hypnosis work conditioning done with people simply in a hypnotic state?